Business Ethics Case Study for Ethical Dilemma - myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theBusiness Ethics Case Study for Ethical Dilemma. Answer: In the given case study, The Auditors Dilemma, it is observed that Alison is experiencing an ethical dilemma. Alison has inspected and observed that theft of money is taking place in the organization via wrongly dated invoices and the head of purchase, Greg Berg is aware of the incident and is actively involved in it as well. She is in conflict regarding whether she should do perform her duty or be loyal to her employer. Alison is aware of the fact that she had agreed to abide by the IIA code of ethics and as an auditor, it is her responsibility to analyze whether the companys financial system is adequate as well as effective. Therefore, there are various factors she must consider while taking an ethical decision which would help her to make the right choice (Hartman, DesJardins MacDonald, 2014). The analysis of the case study from the Act Utilitarian perspective reveals that it would be unethical for Alison to pay the invoices early. If Alison agrees to provide her assistance to Greg, she would be affecting the sales process of the company since the sales team would not be performing up to the mark for fulfilling the quota requirement. Apart from this, the chances of this theft being discovered is high and would have a great negative impact on Alisons career. In the event of Alison not reporting this theft, she would be directly violating the Kantian ethics. The Kantian ethics state that an individual must always abide by the code of ethics and not deceive her superiors. The analysis of the case from the Rule Utilitarian perspective reveals that Alison has many obligations to follow which include company policies, accounting codes and ethics, company laws, and so on. The Rule Utilitarian theory states that an individual is morally obliged to follow those rules, which have a positive impact or consequence. However, it is difficult to arrive at a conclusion regarding the consequence until the effect of following the rules in analyzed among all the individuals working in the organization. The analysis of the case according to the prima facie duties stated by Ross, it reveals that both Alison and Greg are justified from their individual viewpoint. However, considering the weight of the activity taking place, both the individuals are aware that the practice is unethical in nature. Therefore, it is Alisons job to refuse the payment of the invoices and report the activity to the higher authorities. It can be concluded by stating that the Kantian theory may be the most effective in deciding a course of action that should take place. Alison has all the right to treat her employer and fellow employees as a means since her real duty lies with that of reporting to the superiors of the company (Bowie, 2017). Taking part in the theft would mean that Alison has failed in upholding her principles and performing her job, which means to be doing wrong with her superiors rather than her employer or co- workers. References Bowie, N. E. (2017).Business ethics: A Kantian perspective. Cambridge University Press. Hartman, L. P., DesJardins, J. R., MacDonald, C. (2014).Business ethics: Decision making for personal integrity and social responsibility. New York: McGraw-Hill.